Custom Search
Top Stories
Go to Site Index See "Top Stories" main page
COMMENTARY · 4th January 2012
Terrace Daily
For our Readers information this article, attached below, is how the Vancouver Sun is presenting the Enbridge Issue. After erroneously presenting the Gitxsan Treaty Society and Office as being true representatives of the Gitxsan Hereditary Chiefs and the Gitxsan People, this article continues the charade of presenting unbiased information.

As we described previously CLICK HERE this type of article is deluding the regular reader. It appears as if the Vancouver Sun is preparing the groundwork for Government intervention when the protesters begin getting shot as they stop the project. Don't forget Gustafsen Lake READ MORE HERE. Readers of the Vancouver Sun may feel the Government is justified after consuming a continuous feed of this type of information.


EDMONTON — Oil producers could lose $72 billion over a nine-year-period if a pipeline to carry Alberta bitumen to the West Coast isn’t built, a new report for the Alberta government says as community hearings for the proposed Enbridge Northern Gateway project are about to begin this month in British Columbia.

In a 44-page report submitted before Christmas to the federal government panel reviewing the pipeline project, consultants for Alberta Energy peg potential losses for oil producers in the project at $8 billion every year between 2017 and 2025.

The forecast, drawn up by Houston-based consultant Harold York for the firm Wood Mackenzie, is largely based on the expectation that Alberta oil sells at a higher price on an international market than it does in North America.

“If we can get it offshore, there are a lot more markets available to us which are willing to pay a higher price,” Alberta Energy spokesman Tim Markle said.

The outlook does not deal with the oilsands production boost anticipated as a result of pipeline construction. It also does not deal explicitly with the effects that offshore bitumen sales would have on oil royalties collected by the Alberta government.

Read the Rest Here
Why I support Direct Democracy
Comment by JoeJoe on 5th January 2012
One issue, one vote. I don't care to vote for politicians because they don't serve the common people. Most of the media is owned by 7 super rich corporations who don't serve the working man and manage to swing every federal and most provincial elections to parties which benefit huge and often foreign corporations but which don't benefit the little guy even a little bit.
My point is that since the Canadian and Provincial governments don't provide representation for the people who were fooled into voting for them, they need to be replaced.
Not with another political party in the same corrupt system, but by a vote for every registered voter on the actual issues which WE feel are important enough to vote on. That's right - I'm so sick of voting for half-truths and outright lies that the only vote I'm interested in is a binding vote on the issues.

It's true we might get lucky once in a while and find a charismatic leader with the people's interests at heart, and if he/she doesn't have an accident or die of 'something' we might get a brief respite from the tyranny we now live under, but that's no longer good enough.

Why not have it all? Why not have a vote by referendum on such things as fish farms, privatizing hydro, selling off BC ferries, the BC rail sale/heist, carbon taxes and all the rest. You can be damn sure BCers would have made different decisions than their 'government' made. And you can be damn sure we would have made better decisions for US. (This doesn't concern treaty rights because Native Indians have unceded land claims and that is a legal matter before the courts. I only hope they stop the pipeline because it is their land and their water and a big spill on land or sea would never get cleaned up.)

Federally we could be assured of more funding for health care and less tax cuts for corporations - which pay 15% taxes while we pay 30% and up. You could be sure that most Canadians would not vote to go to war in foreign countries where we have no interest and no business. When I read about our involvement in Libya and how innocent families with young children were bombed to smithereens (between 90 and 120 thousand casualties, the vast majority non-combatants) it makes me sick to think that Canada was part of that. Did they ask those people if they wanted to be invaded? No, because the vast majority would sure as heck have said no. Is that democracy? No, that is regime change for the benefit of bankers and oil companies.

So I'm saying that if that's the best our federal and provincial governments can do, it's not good enough. Far better to run the country with the votes of ordinary, decent Canadians.

Of course you hardly ever find this in the alternate media because they are either fronts for the corporate media or they are so plugged in - just like that film The Matrix - that they can't see the forest for the trees. Have a great day and at least think about if you would like to have a say in your government yourself.