Custom Search
Top Stories
Go to Site Index See "Top Stories" main page
CONTRIBUTION · 10th May 2011
Kevin Annett
The Authors website www.hiddenfromhistory.ca

My bleeding Canadian heart was so relieved today when I read that an “international forensics team” is hurrying to the west coast to disinter and investigate the remains of those poor, cute little sled dogs that got shot soon after the 2010 Olympics.

International experts hired for sled dog investigation A team of international forensic experts has been hired to dig up the mass grave of 100 sled dogs slaughtered in Whistler last year,CBC News

Don’t say we aren’t a humanitarian people. We Canucks sure love our pets, at least.

We have the English to thank for our civilized humanity, of course. Sometime around the time of the war that was supposed to end war, when over a thousand miners in south Wales had died from explosions and on the job accidents, King George V wrote an incensed letter to the mine owners of the region, demanding that they treat their pit ponies more humanely.

The mine owners complied.

Around the same time, the city council of Norwich enacted a law protecting the local toad population by ordering the suspension of buckets every few hundred yards along the local roadways. If residents didn’t carry the toads across the road to avoid their getting mashed by vehicles, the good folk of Norwich could face fines or imprisonment.

The toads were saved.

A few years earlier, after shipping out record boatloads of wheat and cattle from a starving Ireland, Queen Victoria and her Church of England sent specialists to Cork and Dublin to see what aid could be brought to the ravenous multitudes there in the form of workhouses for the poor.

The Irish were animals, you see, and therefore worthy of our attention.

Darn it, I am so proud of my heritage of Anglo-Saxon humanitarianism that I’m going to go and personally welcome that forensic team when they arrive next week in Vancouver, to get to the bottom of that horrible crime committed against a bunch of innocent sled dogs.

Besides, being foreigners, the investigators won’t know their way around. They might dig up the wrong mass grave.

I used to have it all wrong about my country. I thought that Canadians just didn’t care about dead little Indian kids. Back in the spring of 2008, I assumed that when not a single cop, politician or reporter replied to my published list of twenty eight mass graves near former Indian residential schools, it was because they were all indifferent to aboriginal people.

I thought, with typical liberal arrogance, that when five hundred native women went missing and the RCMP said there were only nine, it meant our noble Mounties were trying to cover up murder.

How wrong I was.

Of course we care. Indians are animals, after all, and therefore worthy of our tender mercies.

We have allotted the aboriginals the kind of care they deserve, as we do to all our pets. First, after eliminating and breeding out the savage ones among them, we domesticated, neutered and trained the rest to do our bidding. Today, we confine them to kennels and toss them our scraps; and when we discover that wrong has been done to them, we establish a Royal Commission to study the wrong.

Sometimes animals go astray, and need to be hunted. Mistakes are made. But you just can’t rush these things. The Indians aren’t like you and me, and they themselves have not been exactly chomping at their bits to dig up the remains of their own people who have died. We wouldn’t let them, of course, but that’s beside the point. A housebroken animal knows its place.

Besides, thanks to our own special Indian Act, they have no need of the prerogatives of citizenship, like the right to refuse medical treatment or enjoy due process. We take care of our Indians. We know their needs before they do. We will provide them all the compensation, and apologies, and healing and reconciliation that they will ever need.

So why in God’s name should we disturb this special, thoughtful arrangement by digging up the wrong mass grave?

You know, it’s good to live in a country like Canada, where pets get treated the right way; where even the lowest animal can receive justice, and a proper criminal investigation. We care that much.
We all need to stick together
Comment by Cynthia on 20th May 2011
When we look at the big picture, we have to think and stand together. The government is pro at the divide and conquer tactic. They have been using that strategy for decades. Let's be strong and band together and not let them play us against each other. Solidarity is the motto of most of the elders I know. I respect my culture and all my sisters and brothers. Please reconsider. We all come from the same belief of truth, justice and pride.
We are called "First Nations"
Comment by Bonnie Dallyn on 16th May 2011
Again I feel compelled to write. I find the editor's note at the bottom of Amanda & Aaron's opinions very biased. I always thought editors were supposed to be unbiased. Please do not tell me we should be happy that we have an ex-communicated minister, and a white man at that, fighting the good "indian" fight!

We have a wealth of knowledgeable First Nations people to look after us, on our behalf...we don't need some stranger extolling how much we need their help and what a wonderful job he's doing! I did get the point Kevin was making about the dead sled dogs, Cynthia...just hate the reference of "indians" like we're all a bunch of little naughty children that need to be led by hand.

I still find his article derogatory and I'm sure once this gets passed around our community, it will get more comments of outrage! And dear Editor...this paper says it's based on Tsimshian & Haida Arm of the Sacred Circle...why don't the communities of Haida Gwaii receive this paper??????? How'aa to Amanda & Aaron for speaking their minds!

And I'm not ashamed to put my last name to this.
Seriously?
Comment by Amanda Long on 16th May 2011
While I understand the point that Kevin is trying to push forth, for myself and other Aboriginal people that may read this article, I find it rather offensive with the way First Nations people are used as a reference. Animals... really? Couldn't there have been a way around it without the racism and discrimination? Maybe some research can be done to learn where the word "Indian" comes from; while it is clearly labelled on status cards it is in fact an incorrect term. Maybe some research can be done to learn why the Indian Act is in place and what First Nations people as a whole sacrificed to get this Act. And maybe, just maybe people can open their eyes and realize that there are First Nations people in our community, as well as other surrounding communities, who work their butts off for Medical Benefits and such things. Nice try with the article, Kevin. I'm sure the response you get to it isn't going to be the one you wanted.

Ed Note: See www.hiddenfromhistory.ca The author, an ordained and then excommunicated Minister (a first in history), is challenging the world on behalf of the beautiful First Nations Peoples. A white man fighting for the rights of indigenous peoples; what a concept. A game of hacky sack means including everyone. No one is excluded. You want to fight this struggle on your own?
My opinion
Comment by Aaron Viktil on 16th May 2011
I get that he's trying to make it sound absurd that we look for the remains of dogs over humans, I thought the same thing. But to make "us" sound like animals and talk so patronizing about what "we" need is, I think, even more absured. Of course providing us witha life that "they made" and killing our culture to a point of excinction, YEAH of course you would know what is better for us before we would, everything is built around a system that was force fed to us. There are working members of this society that do what they're told and bow down and push forward into a new world, a world of united people, human beings. I believe in freedom of speech and you're intitled to your opinion but this was an idea best kept to yourself. I understand that controvercy is a tool used by writers to draw attention to a certain point but as a FIRST NATIONS person this was just plain old fashioned mean. good day sir.

Ed Note: Again: See www.hiddenfromhistory.ca The author, an ordained and then excommunicated Minister (a first in history), is challenging the world on behalf of First Nations Peoples.
I believe Kevin was using Sarcasm to get his point across
Comment by Cynthia on 16th May 2011
Bonnie, maybe it is the title but really Kevin is trying to point out how absurd it is to have an international forensics team be brought in for sled dogs, and yet there are still thousands, if not hundreds of thousands of buried indian kids out there and no one has done anything.
"Indians" are not pets!!
Comment by Bonnie Dallyn on 15th May 2011
I find this article very derogatory, as a First Nations person...Kevin sounds like he is inciting more hatred and misunderstanding of First Nations people everywhere. Shame on him!! Too bad he wasn't an "indian" when thousands of our people died of smallpox, brought to our lands by foreigners! Too bad he wasn't an "indian" when we were taken from our parents and put into residential schools, beaten for speaking our native language, too bad he wasn't an "indian" when we were told by the government that we could no longer hold potlatches, to celebrate our heritage! Karma's got a wonderful way to deal with people that spread hatred through the media...hope you sleep well at night.